![criminal case pacific bay case 55 criminal case pacific bay case 55](https://www.50gameslike.com/game_images/styled/c/criminal_case_pacific_bay/criminal_case_pacific_bay_0.jpg)
In this tax deferred exchange, Rooz also received a no interest $445,000 note from Kimmel secured by a deed of trust on the Berkeley property. In late 1989, Rooz exchanged an office building he owned at 1841 Berkeley Way in Berkeley (the Berkeley property) for an office building Kimmel owned at 390 South El Camino Real in San Mateo (the San Mateo property). This case arises out of a series of real estate transactions between appellant William B.
![criminal case pacific bay case 55 criminal case pacific bay case 55](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/zSsnpcS6G8g/maxresdefault.jpg)
Consequently, we modify the judgment to permit plaintiff to recover the correct amount of damages ($515,000).
CRIMINAL CASE PACIFIC BAY CASE 55 TRIAL
However, we also conclude the trial court erred in calculating the amount of damages plaintiff is entitled to recover from another defendant. Consequently, we affirm the defense judgment as to North American. We conclude the trial court correctly found the hold harmless agreement protected North American. In this case we must determine whether a hold harmless agreement absolved North American Title Company (North American) of liability for negligence when North American failed to record a deed of trust in a timely fashion. J., and Walker, J., concurring.)Įngland & Belote, Elizabeth A. (Opinion by Parrilli, J., with Phelan, P. DAVID KIMMEL et al., Defendants and Respondents.